How does the Teaching account for giants after the flood?
Quick Answer
The speaker favors the possibility that residual corruption passed through family members on the ark over an unrecorded second incursion; he presents this as a possibility.
Key Scriptures
Detailed Biblical Study
The speaker favors the possibility that residual corruption passed through family members on the ark over an unrecorded second incursion; he presents this as a possibility. Teaching source: Alien Disclosure – It will not be full disclosure. The speaker explicitly says that some future scenarios are “Ed Doss’s opinion,” not “thus says the Lord” (around 1:00:30).
Related Teaching
Alien Disclosure – It will not be full disclosure
This Teaching urges believers to interpret reports of UFOs and alien disclosure through the speaker’s biblical worldview. Beginning with Genesis 1 and humanity as Yahovah’s image-bearers, the speaker reads Genesis 6 as a supernatural transgression involving the sons of God and the Nephilim. He draws on 1 Enoch and Jasher as historical sources but explicitly does not regard 1 Enoch as inspired Scripture. The Teaching links the days of Noah to Yeshua’s warning in Matthew 24 and proposes that apparent alien visitors, human enhancement, and AI could become elements of an end-time deception. These forward-looking connections are the speaker’s interpretation and stated opinion; the transcript does not establish that extraterrestrial disclosure, angelic DNA, or a DNA-based mark has occurred or will occur.